Clinical Survey Methodology Expert (Physician or PhD) — AI Review is a remote clinical-review track for evaluating AI outputs that touch physician. Reviewers grade differential reasoning, dosing logic, and guideline adherence; flag patient-safety issues; and document the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can close the gap.
Physician AI is only useful if a credentialed clinician would sign their name to the output. AuraOne uses licensed and credentialed reviewers to set the bar for clinical reasoning, dosing, and guideline adherence in regulated workflows.
Review clinical and biomedical AI outputs. Your safety judgment is the point.
Responsibilities
Review AI outputs against current physician clinical guidelines and standard of care for Clinical Survey Methodology Expert (Physician or PhD) — AI Review assignments.
Grade differential reasoning, dosing, and red-flag handling on a structured rubric.
Flag patient-safety issues with severity tags that match clinical-incident taxonomies.
Capture the corrected clinical reasoning so the modeling team can train on it.
Adjudicate disputed cases against published evidence or specialty guidelines.
Maintain reviewer-quality scores in weekly inter-rater calibration cycles.
What you should bring
Active or recent license / board certification in physician or an adjacent specialty for Clinical Survey Methodology Expert (Physician or PhD) — AI Review work.
Hands-on clinical experience reading patient cases and writing structured assessments.
Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
Clear written reasoning that cites guidelines, evidence, or standard of care.
Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.
Role signals
Example tasks
Grade a model's differential-diagnosis reasoning on a physician case and write a 2-3 sentence assessment.
Flag a dosing miscalculation with the right severity tag and corrected dose.
Adjudicate a disputed case between two reviewers using current specialty guidelines.
Audit a 25-case batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
Useful experience
Prior work as a guideline reviewer, peer reviewer, or clinical educator.
Familiarity with AI-assisted clinical decision support and its failure modes.
Bilingual clinical experience for non-English patient cases.
Compensation and schedule
$200 / hr
Expected arrangement: contractor, with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.
Skills used in matching
Clinical reasoning
Guideline review
Patient-safety assessment
Structured clinical writing
Physician
Application process
Submitting this form sends your application directly to the recruiting team for this specialist cohort.
