Built to survive an audit.
Every datapoint carries who made it, who reviewed it, and under what rights. Contributor identities are verified and never pooled in one place. Bring the work, and the proof comes with it.
Controls mapped for security, availability, and confidentiality. Any report or audit-window evidence is shared only when current and verified.
Administrative, technical, and physical safeguards wherever the work touches protected health information.
Processor-obligation posture, DPA/SCC workflow, regional scope, and data-subject rights workflows are scoped during review.
A control map, not a slogan.
Controls are mapped to the Trust Services Criteria for security, availability, and confidentiality. We say readiness, not certified. Report and audit-window references are shared only when current evidence is verified in the review packet.
When a competitor lost four terabytes — including who its workers were — pooled data and consumer-grade onboarding were the cause. We do the opposite: identities are verified, and contributor records are kept apart by design.
A security team gets the controls matrix and current verified evidence in one review path. Same path for everyone who asks.
- Security, availability, confidentiality
- Logical and physical access controls
- Change management and code review
- Vendor and subprocessor oversight
- SOC 2-oriented report evidence and audit-window notes, when current and verified
- Controls matrix mapped to CC1–CC9
- Pen-test summary and remediation status
- Subprocessor list and incident history
- ISO 27001 control mapping (certification not claimed)
Protected health information, handled in kind.
Where the work touches protected health information, the administrative, technical, and physical safeguards of the Security Rule apply, with evidence capture aligned to the Privacy Rule.
A Business Associate Agreement is on the table when the workflow needs one. Audit logging, encryption in transit and at rest, and minimum-necessary access apply to every covered workload.
- AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.2+ in transit
- Role-based access with least privilege
- Audit-log retention set by program
- Workforce training and sanction policy
- BAA scope reviewed where PHI is in scope
- Breach notification terms scoped by executed BAA and applicable law
- Risk analysis and management reviews
- Downstream subprocessor obligations reviewed
The rights travel with the data.
We present a GDPR processor-obligation posture. Data Processing Addendum and Standard Contractual Clauses workflows are scoped during procurement, and regional hosting is reviewed by program.
The EU AI Act's high-risk training-data provenance rules begin enforcement in August 2026. Most teams are not ready: 78 percent cannot validate their training data and 77 percent cannot trace its origin. Because every datapoint we deliver carries its own chain of consent, yours survives the audit.
- DPA/SCC workflow scoped during procurement
- Controller / processor roles defined
- Purpose limitation and minimization
- Records of processing activities
- Subject access request workflow
- Erasure and rectification tooling
- Data portability in standard formats
- Regional hosting options reviewed by program
The pack, on request.
Controls maps, security review materials, subprocessor scope, DPA workflow, and BAA scope where applicable. Send the security questionnaire too. One contact, one review path.
Bring the work. Keep the proof. Own the model. Security is the proof half of that promise.