Agree what the review covers
Confirm the workflow, the cohorts, the scoring path, and the data sources the review will pull from.
→A bias score does not survive examination. A review record does. A named independent reviewer checks the model, the findings carry who reviewed them and under what rights, and compliance, security, and procurement read the same record at once.
A named reviewer outside the team that built the model. Not a self-attestation, and not a vendor aligned with one of the labs it serves.
Executive summary, detailed findings, remediation plan — each carrying who reviewed it and under what rights.
Compliance, security, procurement, and leadership read the same evidence at once. Another reviewer can reproduce it.
Four checks define what every review opens with. Each is sized to a deliverable and to the team that will read it — agreed before the reviewer touches a single decision.
Selection and pass-rate deltas across demographic segments.
Adverse impact analysis and significance checks.
Calibration and score-distribution drift checks.
Data handling: redaction, retention, and audit evidence.
Scope. Review. Package. The output is one packet that compliance, security, procurement, and leadership can read at the same time.
Confirm the workflow, the cohorts, the scoring path, and the data sources the review will pull from.
→A named independent reviewer runs the metrics. Distributions, reviewer notes, and retention controls stay attached to the same record.
→One packet for compliance review, remediation, and leadership sign-off — and another reviewer can reproduce it.
What was reviewed, what it found, and what it means — for procurement, legal, and security in one read.
Detailed metrics, slices, intervals, and reviewer notes the audit team can reproduce.
Prioritized fixes, validation steps, and the evidence needed to confirm the fix held.
Compliance reviews scope, findings, and open questions against the record.
Security and procurement inspect the same review pack for diligence and can hand it to a regulator under the EU AI Act, where training-data provenance enforces from August 2026.
Leadership signs off with the findings, remediation path, and deployment decision attached to one record.
An independent reviewer shows what was checked, what it found, and what source material now supports the decision to deploy. Bring the work. Keep the proof. Know what changed.