Who made it
Every datapoint carries the contributor who created it, with identity-verified consent attached.
On the recordReal programs, anonymized by field. Each one shows the work that came in, the record it left behind, and the gate it set for the next release. Bring yours and run the same loop.
Post-training, model risk, manufacturing, clinical, robotics, compliance.
Who made it, who reviewed it, and under what rights.
The layer you run, not a marketplace that locks you in.
The same three facts the market now demands of training data. They travel with every datapoint and every decision — so the record survives an audit and the EU AI Act provenance clock.
Every datapoint carries the contributor who created it, with identity-verified consent attached.
On the recordThe reviewer who signed the hard case stays named on the record, not lost in a screenshot thread.
On the recordThe license the work was created under travels with it — so the record survives an audit.
On the recordPost-training and evals, model risk under examination, manufacturing release, clinical second reads, robotics episodes, training-data provenance. Jump to your field and read the same loop you would run.
An escaped regression had nowhere to go.
Eval tooling stopped at scores and traces. RLHF adjudication, the reviewer who signed it, and the regression it caught now live on one record — and that record holds the next release until it passes.
A score does not survive examination.
Borderline credit, fraud, and AML decisions left a risk score and little else. Now each one carries the reviewer, the escalation, and the regression memory — one examiner-ready packet instead of a screenshot debate.
Detection is not release.
Visual defect detection flagged parts but never approved a release. An escaped defect now becomes a gate: the reviewer signs the call, and the same miss is caught again before the next part ships.
No record proved who read the hard case.
Uncertain inferences routed back to the radiologist qualified for the body region. The rubric, the override, and the reader who signed it stay attached to the case — a record a clinician will trust.
Failure data came with a gig-platform mess.
Task-diverse manipulation and failure episodes captured in real environments, with safety review and rights-cleared consent on every clip. Demonstration capture, teleop review, and export lineage stay on one workflow — a second source you can defend.
78% can't validate training data. 77% can't trace it.
When enforcement begins August 2026, a high-risk model has to show where its training data came from. Each record here carries who made it, who reviewed it, and under what rights — a neutral second source you can defend under audit.
“We needed a second source we could defend under audit. The work comes in, the reviewer signs it, and we keep the weights.”
These are program patterns you can run today. When evaluation moves to procurement, a private reference opens under NDA — named, with the numbers.