It repeats
The same work, every week. Not a one-time project.
AuraOne / Enterprise Intelligence / Design partners
Bring one recurring workflow. Decide whether a bounded engagement makes sense.
Share the current process, inputs, examples, exceptions, business rules, volume, and acceptance criteria. AuraOne uses that evidence to qualify or decline a design-partner scope.
The public intake does not promise implementation, production operation, model work, system access, or ownership. Those outcomes require a signed scope that names the exact boundary.
- Input
- One recurring workflow, its systems, examples, and the person who decides what is correct
- Output
- A qualification decision, open boundary questions, and a written next step when the workflow fits
Fit
Four things make a workflow a good first one.
If your workflow has all four, an initial conversation can assess fit and identify the next questions.
Someone owns it
A named person cares whether it gets done well.
You can measure it
There is a volume, a cost, and a turnaround time today.
You can accept it
Somebody can look at the output and say yes or no.
Brief it, assess it, and decide the next step.
Qualification turns an initial conversation into a bounded decision without implying a production result.
Brief
The workflow and its current evidence.
- How the work is done today, including workarounds and exceptions
- The inputs, outputs, systems, volume, and turnaround that matter
- The person who decides whether an output is correct
Assess
A fit and boundary review.
- Confirm the owner, recurring volume, baseline, and acceptance bar
- Identify data rights, security, retention, review, and access constraints
- Determine whether the evidence supports a bounded engagement
Decide
A documented qualification outcome.
- A clear statement of the workflow candidate and acceptance criteria
- A list of unresolved questions, assumptions, and responsible owners
- A bounded proposal, request for more evidence, or decline decision
How qualification runs
Each step adds enough evidence to make the next decision explicit.
01
Brief
Describe the input, output, volume, systems, exceptions, and current owner.
Workflow brief
02
Baseline
Review available quality, cost, turnaround, human effort, and failure evidence for the current process.
Baseline plan or supplied evidence
03
Boundary
Review rights, security, retention, access, review, and commercial constraints.
Boundary questions and owners
04
Acceptance
Define who judges the result, which cases matter, and what evidence would support a decision.
Acceptance criteria
05
Decision
Propose a bounded engagement, request more evidence, or decline the workflow.
Written qualification outcome
What you receive
A qualification record and a clear boundary
These are intake outputs. Any implementation deliverable must be listed separately in a signed scope.
- Workflow
- Named recurring job, owner, inputs, outputs, systems, volume, and exceptionsWorkflow brief
- Baseline
- Available quality, cost, turnaround, human effort, and failure evidenceCustomer-supplied evidence
- Acceptance
- Named decision owner and measurable definition of correctAcceptance criteria
- Constraints
- Rights, security, retention, access, review, and commercial questionsBoundary review
- Decision
- Proceed to a bounded proposal, gather more evidence, or declineQualification outcome
- Rights
- No data, software, model, output, or downstream rights are implied by intakeSigned scope if applicable
What comes out of qualification
The process determines whether enough evidence and authority exist to propose a bounded engagement.
| Outcome | Work | What you receive | Program fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| A precise workflow candidate | Document the repeated job, required output, current process, and responsible owner. | Workflow brief, supplied examples, and acceptance criteria. | Qualification covers one named workflow and does not authorize system access. |
| A list of boundary questions | Record the rights, security, retention, review, access, and commercial issues that need owners. | Open questions, assumptions, and responsible owners. | Unresolved constraints may prevent an engagement. |
| A scope decision | Choose a bounded proposal, request more evidence, or decline the workflow. | Written qualification outcome and assumptions. | Only a signed agreement creates implementation or operating obligations. |
Design-partner intake
Tell us enough about the workflow to assess fit.
Share the workflow name, what it produces, who performs it today, approximate volume, systems or files involved, any existing model or API, what an accepted result looks like, whether historical accepted outcomes exist, and the first outcome you need. Keep restricted data out of this public brief.
Preparing the design-partner brief…