You own the history
License your operating history on your terms.
- You choose sources, period, fields, and exclusions.
- You keep ownership of the underlying records.
- Nothing is licensed without your written approval.
AuraOne / Data Partnerships
Start with the source and intended use. We assess the material, prepare the permitted slice and define the product it can support.
You decide what is included. You retain ownership of the underlying records. No files or system access are needed to start. A named dataset, rights scope, and buyer program are agreed first.
I cancelled on the 3rd and was charged again on the 5th.
Checking the cancellation date now.
SupportCancellation posted before renewal?
BillingYes. Refund the full cycle.
Account record · edited
Accepted
Refund matches policy. Billing reviewer.
One trajectory
Issue → decision → change → accepted outcome
The excluded field stays out.
You own the history
You run AI agents
You build AI
AI apps and agent traces
Every task leaves a trail. The request. The tools it called. What failed. How it recovered. Whether the work was accepted.
That trail is called a trace. AI teams need traces to train and test better agents. Few have them. You might.
Today a trace partnership starts as a review by our team: business context, then rights, then a sample under NDA. Rebuilding traces as replayable tasks is scoped per program.
This is a voluntary partner program for companies that hold the rights to their own agent traces. Every term is set in a signed agreement. It does not describe how any AuraOne product collects data.
The value is not the final answer. It is the failure, the recovery, and the proof.
AI apps. Coding tools. Inference gateways. Teams whose engineers work with AI agents. A few months old is fine. Volume and outcomes matter more than age.
A raw session log is only the starting record. In a program that rebuilds traces as tasks, each accepted candidate is structured and checked across four aligned parts before release.
The target engineering skill, intended behavior, failure mode, and explicit verifier limitations recorded up front.
A reconstructed problem statement that states the engineering request plainly without leaking solution diffs or hidden test names.
A digest-pinned, network-isolated container and service sidecars that boot identically across repeated cold starts.
Hidden fail-to-pass and preserved-behavior checks verified against reference, plausible-wrong, and alternative solutions.
No single model authors and grades its own task. Separated identities across distinct model families triage, author, attack, review, and clear rights—while recurring failure modes compile into outer-loop calibration rules.
Probes the parent revision against candidate tests and refuses any change that does not fail before the fix.
Writes the four-part task specification, declares checks, and proposes reference, plausible-wrong, and alternative patches.
Runs on a separate model provider without seeing the reference fix or hidden test bodies, attempting to make wrong patches pass or bypass the grader.
Reads Intent, Prompt, World, and Verifier cold on an independent model family and refuses misaligned or under-specified tasks.
Classifies components by prefix with lockfile and scanner evidence, enforces secret remediation, and records per-provider restrictions.
Compiles adversary exploits and post-hoc human audit adjudications into versioned calibration rules and a per-release autonomy manifest.
You already hold the rights. We license accepted data and share the proceeds.
We help you design an opt-in program, set quality gates, and find buyers.
A model builder pays for a specific dataset or environment, scoped up front.
Value is counted in accepted traces, not raw logs. Every term is set in a signed agreement. Payment is never guaranteed.
We start with a conversation about what you record, which rights you hold, and which outcomes you can show. Nothing moves until you approve exactly what moves.
Explore the opportunity
Set two numbers for a rough range. A sample review decides the rest.
Running an AI app or gateway? This estimator is built for operating companies. Traces are judged on volume and outcomes, not headcount. Explore a trace partnership →
100 employees · 10 years · United States
Illustrative licensing range
$370,000 – $945,000
Estimated annual licensing range based on organizational scale, archive depth, and domain demand.
Qualification
Completed during scoping review
Rights, connected workflows, outcomes, and buyer demand decide it. A bounded sample review is how we find out.
Business context only. The next form asks for no files, credentials, or customer records. I already sell a dataset
The range grows with headcount and, more slowly, with years of history. It is capped and rounded to the nearest $5,000. No other input changes it.
Key factors evaluated during a formal archive valuation:
Actual economics depend on rights, buyer demand, workflow continuity, rarity, quality, exclusions, and agreed licensing terms.
Kinds of systems, not integrations. The first review needs no connector and no open access.
What buyers review
File count is not the signal. We look at connected work, visible outcomes, clear provenance, and the rights behind them.
Why this history matters
Operating history holds what someone received, what context they had, which tools they used, what failed, what changed, and what was finally accepted.
Each record comes from work a business actually did.
What you license
The decisions, tools, corrections, and outcomes behind your finished work. You set the scope, and you keep the records.
You choose the sources, period, fields, and exclusions. You retain ownership of the underlying records.
Support, engineering, finance, IT, operations, and physical work, with the context and outcome behind each step.
Newer work can be licensed later under separately approved refreshes, each scoped on its own.
Recognize the asset
The asset is rarely one file. It is the connected history of a task moving from a problem to an accepted outcome.
Could supportCoding tasks with hidden checks, private evaluations, and reviewed correction records.
Could supportSupport agents, troubleshooting evaluations, and long-horizon reasoning tasks.
Could supportIT agents, enterprise troubleshooting, and tool-use training.
Could supportFinancial reasoning, reconciliation evaluations, and back-office agents.
Could supportSales agents, CRM workflows, and research and qualification tasks.
How AuraOne transforms your data
We reconstruct approved work, keep the evidence behind it, and prepare it for the AI teams that license it. Our team does this per program.
Real company work
Related evidence distributed across the systems your teams used to complete work.
AuraOne
Find high-signal workflows and confirm what can legally and safely be licensed.
Flag personal information, customer identifiers, credentials, secrets, and excluded fields for removal or transformation under the agreed scope.
Connect related events across systems into one coherent record of work.
Organize messy history into context, decisions, actions, corrections, and outcomes.
Define acceptance criteria, expert reference answers, rubrics, or deterministic checks.
AI-ready assets
The Data Asset Dossier
A dossier states what an asset holds, where it came from, how it was checked, and what it may be used for. Each fact carries its review state.
Standardized structure for rights verification, schema documentation, and quality reporting.
How we evaluate
Every metric carries a definition and a state. A number appears only after a reviewer records the method, the sample, and the result.
| Metric | Definition | State |
|---|---|---|
| Outcome visibility | Share of sampled trajectories with an attributable accepted outcome. | Assessor to verify |
| Trace continuity | Share of sampled trajectories that contain every required stage. | Not evaluated |
| Independent benchmark | Pass rate on a held-out set against a declared baseline, with the method. | Not evaluated |
Supplier statistics stay labeled Supplier reported, however precise they look.
Three partnership programs
Start with the work that already exists, establish an agreed refresh cadence, capture work that was never digitized—or combine the three under clearly defined scopes.
Historical Data
AuraOne identifies bounded, high-value workflows in approved archives and prepares them for AI research, training, and evaluation.
Continuous Data
A historical archive can be paired with monthly, quarterly, or project-based refreshes. Each refresh is separately authorized and can add new edge cases, corrections, outcomes, and evaluation tasks.
Capture Data
AuraOne designs structured capture programs for physical and spoken work, including field service, repairs, inspections, logistics, manufacturing, construction, equipment operations, and robotics.
What determines value
Rarity and quality matter more than raw volume. A smaller connected history with decisions, corrections, and accepted outcomes can be more useful than a large archive of isolated files. Every opportunity is reviewed before any valuation or program is proposed.
Value is driven by domain rarity, workflow continuity, verified outcomes, clear rights, and active buyer demand. Every archive is reviewed against these criteria to structure a tailored licensing proposal.
Rights, privacy, and control
AuraOne works from bounded, approved scopes, not open access. Sources, exclusions, permitted uses, retention, and delivery terms are set in writing before anything is licensed.
You approve the sources, time period, fields, exclusions, and permitted uses before licensing.
Licensing does not transfer ownership of the underlying records unless a signed agreement explicitly says otherwise.
The agreement names what stays out: personal information, credentials, account identifiers, secrets, and anything else you exclude.
Every partnership defines
Rights matter. AuraOne only licenses data you have the right to provide. Customer-owned, client-owned, or third-party data remains excluded unless appropriate rights and authorization exist.
Rights and licensing
Your stated preferences guide the conversation. Every partnership is governed by a bilateral licensing agreement with explicit permitted uses and exclusions.
You do. Licensing does not transfer title. The signed agreement defines what AuraOne may do and for how long.
We start from business context only. If a sample is needed, it comes later, under an NDA, through a transfer path we approve together.
Mark it as restricted. Only material you have the rights to provide, with approved fields and purposes, moves forward.
Following initial discovery, our team reviews a bounded sample to prepare a formal archive valuation and licensing structure.
We record your preferences. They become binding only in a signed agreement.
Each refresh needs an agreed cadence and scope. Nothing connects to your systems on its own.
Public examples are standardized specimens or separately authorized. Access to a protected sample is reviewed first.
The agreement sets the term, renewals, termination, and retention. Data already delivered cannot be recalled remotely.
Read the privacy policy, the security page, and pricing.
Signals we commonly look for
A long operating history helps, but uniquely valuable or high-volume workflows can qualify with much less history. The strongest candidates combine proprietary work, defensible rights, meaningful outcomes, and evidence that cannot be reconstructed from public sources.
Common candidates include software and B2B SaaS companies, MSPs, support-heavy businesses, financial and professional services, ecommerce, logistics, field services, and industrial operators. Our team evaluates workflow depth and rights clarity across every candidate archive.
Transactions and transitions
Years of operating history may represent a separately licensable AI asset. AuraOne can evaluate it before systems are decommissioned, a business is sold or divested, or historical records are deleted.
For founders, private-equity firms, M&A advisors, restructuring professionals, bankruptcy advisors, and corporate divestiture teams.
Every stage has a defined source, decision owner, rights boundary, and deliverable.
01
Describe the systems, operating history, workflow depth, ownership, and any work that was never captured.
Initial scope and rights context
02
AuraOne assesses workflow continuity, outcomes, corrections, rarity, exclusions, and potential AI uses.
Bounded sample and opportunity assessment
03
Historical, continuous, or capture scope is defined with rights, permitted uses, controls, delivery, and economics.
Written scope and proposed terms
04
Approved sources are prepared within the agreed exclusions, reconstructed, structured, verified, and presented for the agreed sign-off.
Prepared assets and approval record
05
AI-ready assets are delivered under the agreement. Any later refresh follows its authorized cadence and scope.
Delivery manifest or refresh record
Start with the asset
Tell us what systems you used, how far the history goes, what outcomes exist, and whether the business is operating, transitioning, winding down, or closed.
I own the data
Tell us what your systems recorded. No files or access needed.
Assess your dataI already sell a datasetI need data
Tell us what the model must learn or prove.
Discuss a data need