Back to filtered roles

Human Data / Frontier Model Evaluation

BI dashboards / performance reporting Evaluator

BI dashboards / performance reporting Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric.

ContractorRemote — US-eligible$80–$120 / hr

About the role

BI dashboards / performance reporting Evaluator is a remote evaluation track for reviewing bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation prompts and responses against AuraOne's quality rubric. Reviewers compare paired outputs, label edge cases, and write the kind of structured feedback the modeling team can use to retrain.

AI data reviewers help turn bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation outputs into auditable labels, rationales, and regression cases for AuraOne Human Data.

Review frontier model outputs. Judge benchmark failures and calibrate other evaluators.

Responsibilities

  • Evaluate bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation model outputs against a versioned rubric and assign severity tags for BI dashboards / performance reporting Evaluator assignments.
  • Compare paired responses and pick the stronger answer with a written rationale.
  • Label hallucinations, instruction-following failures, and unsafe content with structured tags.
  • Capture ambiguous prompts and route them back to the program team for rubric updates.
  • Maintain reviewer-quality scores by calibrating against gold-standard examples each week.
  • Document recurring failure modes so the modeling team can target them in the next training run.

What you should bring

  • Prior evaluation, annotation, or human-rater experience on bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation or adjacent content for BI dashboards / performance reporting Evaluator work.
  • Comfort applying multi-page rubrics consistently across long batches.
  • Clear written reasoning that names the issue and the rubric clause being applied.
  • Strong attention to detail and the ability to flag when a prompt itself is the problem.
  • Reliable async availability for at least 10 hours per week.

Role signals

Example tasks

  • Compare two bi dashboards / performance reporting evaluation model responses to the same prompt and pick the stronger one with rationale.
  • Tag an unsafe response with the correct policy category and severity.
  • Audit a 50-row batch for rubric consistency and report drift to the program lead.
  • Propose a rubric clarification after spotting a recurring failure mode.

Useful experience

  • Background in linguistics, content moderation, or trust & safety review.
  • Experience with inter-rater agreement metrics and calibration cycles.
  • Domain expertise that lets you spot subject-matter errors automated checks miss.

Compensation and schedule

$80–$120 / hr

Expected arrangement: contractor, with program-defined task volume and review pacing. Placement depends on current program demand and reviewer confirmation.

Skills used in matching

  • Model output evaluation
  • Rubric-based annotation
  • Severity tagging
  • Inter-rater calibration
  • BI dashboards / performance reporting evaluation

Application process

Submitting this form sends your application directly to the recruiting team for this specialist cohort.