AuraOne / Enterprise Intelligence
Send the work. Get it back finished and checked.
Define a recurring workflow, connect authorized inputs and tools, and review the exceptions against your quality standard.
Each item comes back with a record of who decided and by which rule. Corrections stay in your record.
- You bring
- One recurring job, its exceptions, and the person who says what is correct
- You get back
- Finished work, and a record of who decided each item and why
- Production workflows
- Claims, onboarding, document review, catalogs, and chart review
- Supplier sheetXLSX
- Menu photoJPG
- Price listPDF
- Software118Stable steps
- Reviewer21Checked to standard
- Exception3Asked, not guessed
Built workflows
Five workflows. Each one finished and checked.
Software handles the steps your rules settle. Qualified people handle the rest. Every item comes back with its record.
What we run
The work, and what each record keeps
Each workflow combines deterministic rule checks with qualified human review and full decision provenance.
- Insurance claims
- Each claim is checked against your rule table and returns with a proposed outcome and amount. Every exception goes to a person. Every denial gets two reviewers.Who decided, by which rule, and what changed
- Customer onboarding
- Customer, employee, or vendor records are checked against your requirements. A reviewer settles what a rule cannot. Identity and sanctions checks stay with your vendor.Each requirement, its result, and any correction
- Document review
- Spreadsheets, structured files, and labeled text are checked field by field against your checklist. Any item that fails a rule routes to a qualified reviewer.Every field changed, and why
- Catalogs and menus
- Menu photos, spreadsheets, and phone notes become a menu that meets the marketplace standard. A missing price, allergen, or modifier is flagged, never guessed.What changed, who reviewed it, and why it passed
- Medical-chart review
- Charts are checked against your documentation checklist. Each finding points to the line it came from. It never diagnoses or recommends care.Each finding, its source line, and the reviewer's decision
Source → result
From supplier sheet to a review-ready record.
Select a field to trace it into the record. Capacity stays open until the supplier confirms it.
Catalog normalization specimen
Selected fieldCapacity: Not suppliedbecomesCapacity: Needs supplier confirmation
Supplier sheetProduct details
Catalog recordStoneware bowl- The supplier sheet leaves capacity blank, so the record flags it instead of guessing.
What the engagement delivers
Bring the work. Get the result. Keep the memory.
You don't hire AuraOne to advise you how to automate a workflow. You give us the workflow. We return the finished result against an agreed service level.
- You bring
- One recurring job, its real inputs, and the standard an accepted result must meetWorkflow and acceptance brief
- AuraOne runs
- Software handles stable steps. Qualified people review the work and handle exceptionsScoped operating workflow
- You receive
- Finished work in the agreed format and against the agreed service levelAccepted delivered result
- What compounds
- Accepted outcomes and rights-permitted corrections become reusable tests for the next cycleReview and regression memory
What compounds
Approved corrections are kept.
The asset is the process, not the final document. Repeated corrections become reusable evaluation data for the same job.
With your approval, a reviewed correction becomes a test for your next cycle. It stays in your record, never another customer’s.
As reviewed outcomes accumulate at volume, your evaluation dataset can power a dedicated task-specific model tailored to your workflow.
- Reviewed correctionCapacity was blank. The record asked the supplier.
- Kept as a testA blank capacity is flagged, never guessed.
- Dedicated modelA task-specific model for this one workflow.
Next step
Bring us one workflow.
Start with a focused pilot on one recurring workflow with clear acceptance criteria and turnaround targets.
From workflow brief to a scoped decision
01
Describe the workflow
Tell us the job, who owns it, and how it works today. Include the volume and the cases that break the rules.
Workflow brief
02
Define correct
Identify who accepts the result and what evidence is needed to judge quality.
Acceptance criteria
03
Align on security and data handling
Confirm data handling, access controls, retention policies, and reviewer routing.
Security & governance checklist
04
Launch the workflow pilot
Lock the acceptance bar, connect sample or live inputs, and run the first pilot batch.
Pilot kickoff
Start with a focused workflow pilot.
Share your workflow requirements, sample inputs, and quality bar to scope a pilot with our engineering and operations team.
Pilot overview
How a workflow pilot is structured
Every pilot focuses on one recurring workflow with measurable acceptance criteria and end-to-end auditability.
- Scope
- One recurring workflow with a designated owner and measurable acceptance criteriaPilot brief
- Delivery mode
- Run as a managed batch operation or connect directly to your systems via scoped connectorsManaged or integrated
- Quality control
- Automated rule checks paired with qualified human review on exceptions and high-risk itemsAdjudication standard
- Audit trail
- Every item returns with the rule applied, reviewer decision, and field-level diffDelivery receipt